|
The Federal Government has now released the Thriving Kids Advisory Group Final Report, alongside the No Child Left Behind parliamentary report released in December 2025. Together, these documents signal the direction the Government is taking as it shapes the final design of the Thriving Kids program.
The Government’s response raises serious concerns from a clinical and workforce perspective. It places early identification of developmental delay in the hands of a largely non-health, non-clinical workforce, which risks missed red flags, inconsistent assessments, and delayed referral to appropriately qualified professionals. But it does specifically name psychology as an included profession.
Psychologists play a critical role in early identification, assessment, and evidence-based intervention for developmental delay, autism, ADHD, and emerging mental health concerns. Our expertise is essential not only for accurate assessment, but for guiding families through what can be an overwhelming and emotionally demanding process.
The model also places significant responsibility onto parents, despite the reality that families have often already spent months or years advocating, researching, and attempting to access support before delays become formally recognised. Time-limited allied health interventions do not reflect the complexity of many children’s needs, nor the evidence around what effective early intervention actually requires.
We are also concerned that this model risks shifting additional responsibility onto schools and early learning settings, at a time when teachers and education staff are already under significant strain. Expecting overburdened teachers to take on more identification, monitoring, and coordination responsibilities, without corresponding resourcing or specialist support, is not sustainable and may undermine both educational and wellbeing outcomes.
A more effective approach would embed psychologists earlier in the pathway, ensure timely access to skilled, regulated health professionals, and allow interventions of sufficient duration to support meaningful developmental change. This would reduce pressure on families, support carers to remain engaged in the workforce, and improve long-term outcomes for children. This is what AAPi is fighting for.
Early childhood reform must strengthen, not dilute, access to psychological expertise. If we are genuinely committed to helping children thrive, we need a model that recognises the central role of psychologists in delivering safe, effective, and developmentally informed care.
Based on the reports and current government actions, here is what AAPi members need to know.
Program design will be decided by state governments
The Advisory Group’s final report outlined a national model for foundational supports delivered outside the NDIS, but the Government has since stated that the design will be up to state and territory governments to decide. AAPi will therefore need to work with all government departments, often across portfolios, as well as the federal government.
The government has declared that they are prioritising continuity of care
The parliamentary committee emphasised that access to existing therapy must not be disrupted and recommended a slow, staged rollout with protections. This is particularly important for psychologists supporting children with complex developmental, behavioural, or learning needs, and it addresses one of AAPi’s key concerns: that early supports not be withdrawn before new systems are ready.
Stronger recognition of psychologists is emerging
The government’s commissioned reports repeatedly acknowledge that psychology is essential, and reforms will not succeed without proper involvement from the sector.
The report emphasised the need to explicitly embed psychologists across design, governance, workforce planning, and evaluation. The language echoed in the committee’s findings.
AAPi’s own evidence was also cited, including:
- The need to address gaps in access to psychological services.
- Expanding workforce capacity, including provisional psychologists in rural/remote placements.
- Removing barriers to assessments and expanding rebates.
Implications for psychologists’ inclusion in Thriving Kids
The final parliamentary recommendations emphasise using existing, regulated providers wherever possible and explicitly involve allied health and psychologists in system reviews and new child development pathways.
The committee recommended a commissioned service model, drawing on existing providers. This creates opportunities for psychologists to participate in regional, community, and early childhood hubs as the model is rolled out.
A stronger focus on culturally safe, neurodiversity-affirming practice is reflected in the final report, mirroring AAPi’s advocacy position.
At this stage, the Government has not announced the complete program model or funding structures. However:
- The implementation of Thriving Kids has already been delayed to October 2026, allowing time for states and territories to prepare and for additional input from peak bodies such as AAPi.
AAPi will continue to advocate to ensure psychologists are centrally embedded in the design and delivery of foundational supports. We will continue direct engagement with all levels of government and push to ensure that psychologists are front and centre, that funding and workforce measures include sustainable funding and the use of provisional psychologists with proper supervision. AAPi is being proactive in this process.
We will provide further updates as the Government releases implementation details.
|